|
|
#76 |
|
I'm A Prize Fight Lover...
![]() Join Date: 22.10.2003
Location:
Posts: 5,532
|
Thanks. All I wanted was reassurances for things to be fair. As there's only R. and about 5 mods that actively do something on a regular basis, I have question marks surrounding the others and their ability to fairly give out points.
Pud |
|
|
|
|
|
#77 |
|
Inaugural goldfish winner
![]() Join Date: 04.07.2005
Location:
Posts: 2,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#78 |
|
You dig.
![]() Join Date: 02.04.2002
Location:
Posts: 7,179
|
Infractions can be reversed or even deleted, so if an infraction you received seems to be unfair, let us know.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#79 |
|
Armed ba$tard and Jo's other half.
![]() Join Date: 06.08.2002
Location:
Posts: 16,104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#80 |
|
Inaugural goldfish winner
![]() Join Date: 04.07.2005
Location:
Posts: 2,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#81 |
|
Mega Loafer
![]() Join Date: 24.06.2005
Location:
Posts: 17,909
|
"and what do points make?? PRIZES"
|
|
|
|
|
|
#82 |
|
Mega Loafer
![]() Join Date: 02.03.2004
Location:
Posts: 3,177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#83 |
|
Mega Loafer
![]() Join Date: 24.06.2005
Location:
Posts: 17,909
|
thats a terrible prize.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#84 |
|
Inaugural goldfish winner
![]() Join Date: 04.07.2005
Location:
Posts: 2,373
|
How many points does it take to win a goldfish?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#85 |
|
I'm A Prize Fight Lover...
![]() Join Date: 22.10.2003
Location:
Posts: 5,532
|
I thought them animal rights activist, tree hugging hippie type b'stards banned people from winning goldfish
Pud |
|
|
|
|
|
#86 |
|
Inaugural goldfish winner
![]() Join Date: 04.07.2005
Location:
Posts: 2,373
|
Oh alright, a fluffy teddy then.
Or does the Royal Society for the Protection of Stuffed Toys object to that? |
|
|
|
|
|
#87 | |
|
I'm A Prize Fight Lover...
![]() Join Date: 22.10.2003
Location:
Posts: 5,532
|
http://www.mlukfc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=8849
Quote:
Can we have some clarification please? Pud |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#88 |
|
Relentless
![]() Join Date: 21.11.2003
Location:
Posts: 18,694
|
OK.
As R. said earlier, the infraction system itse;f doesn't actually provide any rules at all, it's merely a method of enforcing them if the need arises. With respect to your specifc question Pud. Whilst it may not technically be a breach of the PM policy, it is still bad form (along with being in breach of the forum rules) is it not to publicly post a discussion about moderation decisions? End of the day there can't be an individual infraction for every possible break of the rules, so the best fit was used I guess. Infraction points are only visible to the moderation team and the member who has incurred them. Anyone else curious about anything? Or can I go back to installing this router and all the guff that's come with it? |
|
|
|
|
|
#89 |
|
Inaugural goldfish winner
![]() Join Date: 04.07.2005
Location:
Posts: 2,373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#90 |
|
The Monster Is Luce
![]() Join Date: 14.04.2002
Location:
Posts: 7,547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#91 |
|
The German
![]() Join Date: 11.03.2006
Location:
Posts: 15,778
|
Here´s an idea:
how about an anti-infraction system, where you can earn positive things with senseful posts or helping other users? So that could compensate the negative points. And on the other hand people would have a reason for good behaviour and politeness. eh? |
|
|
|