60. 45 Seconds Of Ecstasy - Page 2

Wild_Honey · 07 Dec 2003, 19:31

It's errrmmm... a bit... useless?

But I'd give it a 2/10.

evil nickname · 07 Dec 2003, 19:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by LukeEdwards999

I am sure that someone, somewhere has a good reason for including this, but for the life of me I can't see it.

The story behind WTTN was about a boy's life from his first date 'til his death, right? I think it's pretty obvious what this song is about. Doing the horizontal boogie, or however you'd like to call it. With that in mind, it fits the concept.
Also, reconsider the last name of the singer. I suspect a pseudonym :)

William (who still stands by his original rating)

LostSoul · 29 Dec 2003, 23:33

This "track" definitely deserves to be in the WTTN story line but I do not consider it as a song but as an "intermezzo".

And of course "45 Seconds Of Ecstasy" between "Sin" and "Red Light" is not too difficult to understand what it is about!

2/10 something missing here... maybe Meat's voice on it...

Michel · 31 Dec 2003, 11:45

He did a part of this song in Trier on 2 november this year.

Bart · 02 Jan 2004, 15:59

this song is soooo funny. First time back in 95 when i listen to the record, i had to laugh so loud when i hear this. It is just funny that it is on the album. I like it. It makes me happy. And the woman sings very well.

Rob The Badger · 02 Jan 2004, 16:27

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quigmo

I think "45 seconds" is 1:06 of unnecessary filler. No one would have missed it if it wasn't there.
0 / 10

Yup. FILLER.

LostSoul · 05 Jan 2004, 16:09

Quote:

Originally Posted by Michel

He did a part of this song in Trier on 2 november this year.

Do you mind if I cry?

*AndyK* · 05 Jan 2004, 20:40

All I can say is why is it there?

I don't think it fits at all on WTTN, unlike Intermezzo or some of the Steinman penned "fillers".

I reckon it's a mistake, an elaborate April Fools Day prank gone wrong - rather like Microsoft

Sparky · 19 Jan 2004, 13:33

My score: 2

MLFAN17 · 25 Jan 2004, 20:43

I think Susan has a great voice. I just dont get the point to the song or why it was put on any album? Who is susan wood anyway and why was she never used again?

jcmoorehead · 25 Jan 2004, 22:52

Quote:

I think it's pretty obvious what this song is about. Doing the horizontal boogie, or however you'd like to call it.

Considering the nature of a lot of the songs on Meats albums this really wouldnt suprise me

:P

meat loaf is my god · 07 Feb 2004, 22:22

Its not Song but it makes me lauth so ill give it a 5/10

Jackoutofhell · 23 May 2006, 19:00

I HATE this song. I scorn, and despise it. Whoever wrote this so called "song" needs to be punished, severely. It is an utterly pointless, stupid excuse for a track, and gives the worst example of Meat Loaf ever.

mszee · 23 May 2006, 19:29

Cute song...but don't know about having it on that album...and I hate the idea that it comes right after Original Sin...I don't want my mood lightened up after the Original Sin...I want more of the same...JMO

Mick Loaf · 23 May 2006, 20:33

I like it. The lady can sing. 8/10

L96 · 23 May 2006, 22:31

I thoroughly enjoy this song, sure it ain't Meat, but ah, it reminds me of some people I used to know

...

No offense intended to anyone, but my computer had a nasty bug or something at some point, and it wouldn't play anything but 45 seconds.... that was the night they attempted to blow up London. Sad, but humourous in a sick kind of way.

That aside, it's an enjoyable and fun song that breaks the montony a bit, 8/10.

Bart · 29 May 2006, 15:43

Just like Meat said on 23rd of april 2003 before the concert in Amsterdam. "Everybody ask me why is Do it on the album? Well, it is there cause it is fun! "

Probably same reason with 45 seconds....

Caelan · 30 May 2006, 08:51

and it really is fun

AndrewG · 30 May 2006, 12:18

It's a strange intermezzo IMO. I don't think it is bad, it's quite well done in fact.

Jackoutofhell · 30 May 2006, 18:09

Fun? No, more like embarrassing. Not something I want playing when a friend walks into the room.. quite stupid.

PanicLord · 30 May 2006, 21:08

I think it's an amusing bit of fun - I can never understand why it's more than 45 seconds though!!!

AndrewG · 30 May 2006, 22:44

Quote:

Originally Posted by TRex2006

I think it's an amusing bit of fun - I can never understand why it's more than 45 seconds though!!!

Maybe it should be 66 seconds of Ecstasy???

mikeloaf · 01 Jun 2006, 00:26

I may be wrong because it's probably very meaningful, but I consider it a fun 'bridge' between two songs. Perhaps true ecstacy only lasts 45 seconds!

It's cool!

Evil One · 23 Jan 2007, 23:24

1

White of High · 25 Jan 2007, 21:47

Average: 4.40 (105.5/24)

07 Dec 2003, 19:31	#26
Wild_Honey Super Loafer Join Date: 23.03.2003 Location: Windeck, Germany Posts: 606	It's errrmmm... a bit... useless? But I'd give it a 2/10.

29 Dec 2003, 23:33	#28
LostSoul Got metal? Join Date: 06.11.2003 Location: Switzerland Posts: 2,109	This "track" definitely deserves to be in the WTTN story line but I do not consider it as a song but as an "intermezzo". And of course "45 Seconds Of Ecstasy" between "Sin" and "Red Light" is not too difficult to understand what it is about! 2/10 something missing here... maybe Meat's voice on it...

31 Dec 2003, 11:45	#29
Michel Mega Loafer Join Date: 14.04.2002 Location: Stadskanaal, The Netherlands Posts: 1,631	He did a part of this song in Trier on 2 november this year.

02 Jan 2004, 15:59	#30
Bart Bald Mega Loafer Join Date: 06.03.2003 Location: Holland, but I prefer Greece Posts: 2,243	this song is soooo funny. First time back in 95 when i listen to the record, i had to laugh so loud when i hear this. It is just funny that it is on the album. I like it. It makes me happy. And the woman sings very well.

05 Jan 2004, 20:40	#33
AndyK Relentless Join Date: 21.11.2003 Location: Over the top..... seeing what's on the other side Posts: 18,694	All I can say is why is it there? I don't think it fits at all on WTTN, unlike Intermezzo or some of the Steinman penned "fillers". I reckon it's a mistake, an elaborate April Fools Day prank gone wrong - rather like Microsoft

19 Jan 2004, 13:33	#34
Sparky Rookie Join Date: 19.01.2004 Location: Innsbruck, Austria Posts: 15	My score: 2

25 Jan 2004, 20:43	#35
MLFAN17 Senior Loafer Join Date: 06.02.2003 Location: Va Posts: 110	I think Susan has a great voice. I just dont get the point to the song or why it was put on any album? Who is susan wood anyway and why was she never used again?

07 Feb 2004, 22:22	#37
meat loaf is my god Loafer Join Date: 19.01.2004 Location: worcester Posts: 94	Its not Song but it makes me lauth so ill give it a 5/10

23 May 2006, 19:00	#38
Jackoutofhell Super Loafer Join Date: 13.03.2006 Posts: 369	I HATE this song. I scorn, and despise it. Whoever wrote this so called "song" needs to be punished, severely. It is an utterly pointless, stupid excuse for a track, and gives the worst example of Meat Loaf ever.

23 May 2006, 19:29	#39
mszee Mega Loafer Join Date: 28.03.2006 Location: And you think you're down under??? Posts: 26,252	Cute song...but don't know about having it on that album...and I hate the idea that it comes right after Original Sin...I don't want my mood lightened up after the Original Sin...I want more of the same...JMO

23 May 2006, 20:33	#40
Mick Loaf Thread Killer Join Date: 10.11.2005 Location: Livingston Posts: 1,140	I like it. The lady can sing. 8/10

23 May 2006, 22:31	#41
L96 Inaugural goldfish winner Join Date: 04.07.2005 Location: In a handbasket. Believe me, for someone my height, it's hell... Posts: 2,373	I thoroughly enjoy this song, sure it ain't Meat, but ah, it reminds me of some people I used to know ... No offense intended to anyone, but my computer had a nasty bug or something at some point, and it wouldn't play anything but 45 seconds.... that was the night they attempted to blow up London. Sad, but humourous in a sick kind of way. That aside, it's an enjoyable and fun song that breaks the montony a bit, 8/10.

29 May 2006, 15:43	#42
Bart Bald Mega Loafer Join Date: 06.03.2003 Location: Holland, but I prefer Greece Posts: 2,243	Just like Meat said on 23rd of april 2003 before the concert in Amsterdam. "Everybody ask me why is Do it on the album? Well, it is there cause it is fun! " Probably same reason with 45 seconds....

30 May 2006, 08:51	#43
Caelan life is one big adventure Join Date: 23.06.2005 Location: some town in Alberta called Leduc Posts: 5,550	and it really is fun

30 May 2006, 12:18	#44
AndrewG I hope your salmon sucks! Join Date: 18.01.2004 Location: Northamptonshire Posts: 7,077	It's a strange intermezzo IMO. I don't think it is bad, it's quite well done in fact.

30 May 2006, 18:09	#45
Jackoutofhell Super Loafer Join Date: 13.03.2006 Posts: 369	Fun? No, more like embarrassing. Not something I want playing when a friend walks into the room.. quite stupid.

30 May 2006, 21:08	#46
PanicLord Mega Loafer Join Date: 18.06.2003 Location: At The End Of The Line Posts: 2,652	I think it's an amusing bit of fun - I can never understand why it's more than 45 seconds though!!!

01 Jun 2006, 00:26	#48
mikeloaf Super Loafer Join Date: 06.11.2005 Location: England UK Posts: 708	I may be wrong because it's probably very meaningful, but I consider it a fun 'bridge' between two songs. Perhaps true ecstacy only lasts 45 seconds! It's cool!

23 Jan 2007, 23:24	#49
Evil One Mega Loafer Join Date: 15.01.2007 Posts: 5,192	1

25 Jan 2007, 21:47	#50
White of High Nature's Siegfried Join Date: 27.05.2002 Location: Budapest, Hungary Posts: 2,930	Average: 4.40 (105.5/24)