Quote:
Originally Posted by WarioLoaf
(Post 549336)
Its probably mostly due to teh echonomy and competition in the states
|
I doubt that. It's more of cultural background. To be honest, I don't think you can compare the BBC with U.S. television. The BBC is the best public network in the World, for a long time sharing it with the German public channels. The U.S. channels (we are talking about) are cable networks. Like Sky and Channel 4. They don't have to have any cultural meaning or background and that shows. BBC shows are 'clever' where cable shows are mostly 'sleazy'.
It's almost unlikely that a BBC show dissapoints me. Just as hardly as a U.S. show will impress me.
Shows like Graham Norton... they wish they could do that in the U.S. Leno and Letterman, and so on and so on, are still living the old Johnny Carson television. They are outdated, unfunny and uninteresting. Same with most tv series wich need Explosions and gunfire more than actual plot (It's almost 'little Hollywood'). Yes they pump millions of dollars in it but they miss clever craftmanship. That's the secret of the BBC imo.
And when a U.S. network tries to take on public opinion or 'shock' they still go safe. The success of the comedy show Will and Grace (about two gay friends) was the lack of gayness. And Ellen DeGeneres actually got slashed for 'the coming out' in the once highly succesfull 'Ellen'.
And then there is censorship as if this is China. (Think of 'nipplegate' and the impact that got on live shows that needed a 10 seconds airing delay so they could bleep/blur).
All in all there is no bravery, no innovation, and a lot of nothing.
Anyway I'm ranting :shock:
It's too bad for Lopez, but in all honesty... how many boring night shows with equally boring hosts and guests can you actually watch :twisted:
|