View Full Version : LOL SUPERBOWL
anotherday
04 Feb 2013, 00:48
Anyone watching the Super Bowl here in USA see the M&MS commercial?
anotherday
04 Feb 2013, 00:58
http://www.superbowl-commercials.org/21761.html
I case you didn't see it
The Flying Mouse
04 Feb 2013, 01:03
:twisted: I wonder if Meat was watching when it aired :lawl:
AndrewG
04 Feb 2013, 01:24
Maybe he was munching on a pack of M&Ms.
Sebastian.
04 Feb 2013, 01:31
I want some M&Ms now. Guess it worked.
BostonAngel
04 Feb 2013, 01:53
I want some M&Ms now. Guess it worked.
I want some too! Time to eat M&M's and listen to Bat II
Elijah's way
04 Feb 2013, 02:56
It seems like this would be the perfect time for a ML and Steinman comback
The Flying Mouse
04 Feb 2013, 03:21
:twisted: Or an electrician :bleh:
Julie in the rv mirror
04 Feb 2013, 05:01
Very cute! :-)
I'm not into football, so I didn't watch the game (only the Halftime show).
loaferman61
04 Feb 2013, 17:23
It seems like this would be the perfect time for a ML and Steinman comback
Anytime would be good for that. Unfortunately with all the money Jim has plus what he rakes in off royalties and these commercials he does not seem motivated to get off his Bat throne he had made. Anything not already laying around would take him at least a year.
Cherry.Loaf
04 Feb 2013, 18:24
I'm not American but I saw it on youtube along with the Ironman 3 trailer and the walking dead advert
we watched it and it is a great commercial. It had been airing all day of the super bowl. who gets the money from M&M's using the song, Meat or Jim?
Beyonce blew out the lights at the super bowl! :D
Evil Ernie
04 Feb 2013, 21:31
we watched it and it is a great commercial. It had been airing all day of the super bowl. who gets the money from M&M's using the song, Meat or Jim?
Beyonce blew out the lights at the super bowl! :D
Jim... All of it.
Publishing and songwriting royalties are gold, especially for a song like AFL.
Perhaps he even produced some part of the track? It WAS pretty well done, it sounded great!
loaferman61
05 Feb 2013, 15:26
Jim... All of it.
Publishing and songwriting royalties are gold, especially for a song like AFL.
Perhaps he even produced some part of the track? It WAS pretty well done, it sounded great!
Yep it all goes to Jim. Writing even one really big hit song can have you set for life. I doubt Jim expended any energy on this beyond endorsing the check.
chairboys
05 Feb 2013, 17:05
Beyonce blew out the lights at the super bowl! :D
It seemed to be catching at the weekend as the lights also went out during Manchester United's match at Fulham.
And then my landing light blew.
Julie in the rv mirror
06 Feb 2013, 01:51
Yep it all goes to Jim. Writing even one really big hit song can have you set for life. I doubt Jim expended any energy on this beyond endorsing the check.
Does Jim hold the publishing as well?
They didn't use Meat's recording, thus he doesn't get paid.
Beyonce blew out the lights at the super bowl!
The NFL says no. Her stage ran on generators, not venue power.
Evil Ernie
06 Feb 2013, 07:52
Does Jim hold the publishing as well?
I'm pretty sure that he holds all publishing rights for most of his music.
I mean, if he wouldn't sell his publishing rights to Celine Dion I'm not sure that he would sell them to anybody. Not to say that CD is anything special or bad, it's just that I've always gotten the impression that Jim protects his music like his children and having somebody else in control of it would kill him.
But I base this on absolutely nothing. For all I know he sold his publishing rights and we're about to have Justin Beiber remake 'Bad For Good'. Duet with Selena Gomez on 'Dance In My Pants.'
Julie in the rv mirror
07 Feb 2013, 00:48
For all I know he sold his publishing rights and we're about to have Justin Beiber remake 'Bad For Good'. Duet with Selena Gomez on 'Dance In My Pants.'
I hate to break it to you, but if Bieber wants to remake "Bad For Good", there's nothing Jim (or anybody) could do to stop him.
Scary, but true! :lol:
Mr. Happy
07 Feb 2013, 01:14
I hate to break it to you, but if Bieber wants to remake "Bad For Good", there's nothing Jim (or anybody) could do to stop him.
?v=a1Y73sPHKxw
I want to hear "Stark Raving Love" and " Safe Sex" done again . Also, I really love " Dance in my pants" and would love to see it done again. Karla and Jim make me giggle watching the video.
So how could someone do one of his songs without his permission? Are they now public domain ( or whatever it is called), like folk songs?
Julie in the rv mirror
07 Feb 2013, 05:40
So how could someone do one of his songs without his permission? Are they now public domain ( or whatever it is called), like folk songs?
No, not public domain. The songwriter gets to choose who gets to record the song first. Once it has been recorded, anybody can record it without permission. They have to pay royalties, but they don't need the songwriter's permission unless they want to change it substantially.
Conversely, royalties do not need to be paid if a song is in the public domain.
Evil Ernie
07 Feb 2013, 18:40
I hate to break it to you, but if Bieber wants to remake "Bad For Good", there's nothing Jim (or anybody) could do to stop him.
Scary, but true! :lol:
Lol. I know. It was just a joke.
No, not public domain. The songwriter gets to choose who gets to record the song first. Once it has been recorded, anybody can record it without permission. They have to pay royalties, but they don't need the songwriter's permission unless they want to change it substantially.
Conversely, royalties do not need to be paid if a song is in the public domain.
A good example is when Sinead O' Conner remade 'Nothing Compares 2 U'. Prince hated when she did that and didn't even know about it until he heard it on the radio.
Sebastian.
07 Feb 2013, 18:42
I hate to break it to you, but if Bieber wants to remake "Bad For Good", there's nothing Jim (or anybody) could do to stop him.
Scary, but true! :lol:
Well they could, it's not legal though. But they may be considered a hero.
Evil Ernie
08 Feb 2013, 07:00
Well they could, it's not legal though. But they may be considered a hero.
As Julie said, anybody can record/perform any song that they want without legal ramifications. It's just a matter of paying the correct royalties.
I mean do you think that Jim approved this? :
ZRFYAjS-PZM
Sebastian.
08 Feb 2013, 11:21
As Julie said, anybody can record/perform any song that they want without legal ramifications. It's just a matter of paying the correct royalties.
I mean do you think that Jim approved this? :
ZRFYAjS-PZM
Well I meant shooting them (Bieber). It would stop them but I hear it carries some hefty legal issues...
lol at the Dan Band, f****ing Falling apart. lol
The Flying Mouse
08 Feb 2013, 16:35
Well I meant shooting them (Bieber). It would stop them but I hear it carries some hefty legal issues...
:twisted: As long as there is such a thing as justifyable homicide, there is always a case for shooting Justin Bieber. :yep:
I'll even throw in a bottle of Jack :mrgreen:
lol at the Dan Band, f****ing Falling apart. lol
I wonder what Von Krolock would have sounded like if Totale Finsternis dropped a few F bombs during the song :lawl:
I mean do you think that Jim approved this? :
One can only hope so...it is fantastic! This is energy, over the top, and bombastic! I have always loved this version of the song, and have even performed it as part of my local Rocky Horror Picture Show preshow rituals.
Monstro
08 Feb 2013, 20:44
One can only hope so...it is fantastic! This is energy, over the top, and bombastic! I have always loved this version of the song, and have even performed it as part of my local Rocky Horror Picture Show preshow rituals.
Hope your version was in tune lol
this is just so funny. I think I will start using this as a SIG line,
"... now I am only f***ing falling apart....." . :-P
:cheer::cheer:
vBulletin® v3.8.10, Copyright ©2000-2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.