Quote:
Originally Posted by CarylB
I agree. And to say " He considers it a platform of abuse and negativity. Hence his poor website." doesn't make sense to me at all. Yes, he does think the internet offers huge scope for abuse, and for spreading untruths .. can't see that he's wrong in that belief either. But that isn't directly linked to having "a poor website" imo .. and he has embraced Facebook which is I think a platform that is far more accessed than a lot of websites, certainly no less. He reads the posts on his FB page, comments and responds as time allows.
Not knowing exactly who comprises his "management team" I'm not sure that his website is something they are involved in. Nor I suspect do any of us  So saying they should step up their game is a bit empty as we don't know that they are players in this area |
Fair point, but I'm just pointing out IF they are involved? Maybe it's something that needs to be looked at.