[loaferman61]

Originally Posted by R.

Don't look at just one thread only. Look further and take time into your consideration. Do you think this issue started just recently? I'll answer that question for you: No. I just skimmed through recent posts and wrote down a few words that got my attention. Here they are:
Quote:
fairly good, struggles, far from perfect, terrible, screaming, weakest, disappointing, autotune, terrible, stupid, bad, lying, worst, painful, disrespectful, mediocre, horrid, slow, passionless, flat

To be fair though I have caught flack for pointing out that on here every show is "perfect", "amazing", "note perfect", etc. There are posts that go to either extreme. Meat seems to be preoccupied with looking for the negatives or paying more attention to them. I wasn't exactly popular for backing his decision to do the endorsement either. Yet at times I have been clear that his voice is always changing, I think sometimes due to how much rest between shows. I thought he sounded fine in-person back in August. I try to call them as I see them and there is little middle ground on the forum, it is either "perfect" or it "sucks" on here it seems at times. Sometimes both are true (although "perfect" is very rare by definition), sometimes it lies in between. Probably most of the time it doesn't really deserve to be said to "suck" either.