Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucy!
For me though, that's the point - this isn't a place where people have turned up in a part of Meat's life and started criticising, this is a place that Meat joined by choice, the same as the rest of us. Don't get me wrong, we're (sometimes) fortunate that the person the site is dedicated to visits us here, but he voluntarily registered as a member here, if he can't cope with anything less than positive then he is under no obligation whatsoever to read it. Personally, if he's not happy with the "negativity" of some of the posts here I'd really rather he chose not to read them rather than kicking off about one negative post and ignoring the numerous positive ones.
|
If he couldn’t cope with receiving negative comments we all wouldn’t be here today as Bat would have never been made as it was rejected by every Tom Dick and Harry. You can't be an artist in any form of life and not be able to take criticism.
There are forums here for people to praise and criticise Meats work and he hasthe right to respond to that criticism and also the praise. Personally I find it quite refreshing that he doesn't respond to all the hero worship praise he gets on here.
If I slaughter an album or make a statement of fact about something that may have occurred or not, he has he right to say I'm talking BS and how he says that is up to him. Personally I think too many people of this world want to be mollycoddled.
Anyway is it not the case that he doesn’t respond to all negative comments because trust me I have made plenty in the past and have never had a negative response from him and yet I have received a positive message from something I once wrote.
Wenners