View Single Post
Old 26 May 2008, 22:39   #23
The Flying Mouse
Armed ba$tard and Jo's other half.
 
Join Date: 06.08.2002
Location:  In the middle of nowhere near the end of the line.
Posts: 16,104
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Monstro View Post
Until that person gets a respiratory disease and then sues the employer because under Health and Safety Law an employer has a legal responsibility to provide a safe working environment, doesn't matter what employee signs.
This is what i'm saying Michael.
That it SHOULD be acceptable for somebody who is possession of all the facts to be able to sign a waver declaring that they are aware of the risks, the risks are there own, and they agree that their employer is not at liberty to take any blame for any illness that should come about through passive smoking.

Would you rather be given the option of taking responsibility for yourself, or losing your job?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Deb View Post
Well I didn't like the fact us non smokers (and our chiLdren in restaurants) DIDN'T have the right to decide before.
Again Deb, no disagreement from me here.
Yes, you should have the option of going to eat at a non smoking restaurant.
But restaurants should also have the right to decide if they are going to be smoking, non smoking, or have areas that cater for both.
The Flying Mouse is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Page generated in 0.04158 seconds with 13 queries.