
*interceeds before it goes any further*
So, we agree that the article was in fact dumb, and the prat who wrote it needs to watch more Meat, or more Simpsons, before making comparisons that don't work.
It WAS written in the press, so I can't see the problem with it being on the forum, even though it isn't 100% positive (even if you did buy Grandpa Simpsons last album).
Now can we go back to calling the journalist a numbnuts?