Sorry Guppie, but I said I RESPONDED to the bahaviour. I said I was upset and wished I had not. Let's make no mistake here. I was attacked .. to be called someone who has violated people, is a deceiver and a liar is an attack; an attack on the person and their integrity. Make no mistake. No matter how one tries to dress it up.
This is a feedback thread not a lets talk about Meat thread, so that's why I have posted here.
I admit I attacked David, because I was attacked. I said I regretted it. Two wrongs don't make a right.
I maintain I do not expect to be attacked by people who are moderating. I hope you are never subjected to this, nor anyone else.
But if you want behavioural based feedback:
When I see the words "there was a vulgar display of deception on Caryl's part" and "someone with a website that claims to be as important as the Republic Of Loafdom would blatently decieve the entire Meat Loaf community in such a manner." I feel I am being accused in pejorative terms in a public forum, and this makes me feel hurt and under attack, which in turn makes me feel the need to hit back, even though it is not the best course of action. What would be helpful to me is if someone thinks I might have deceived people, whether intentionally or not, for them to ask me to explain what has happened.
Now that's textbook behavioural feedback. I've written a published book including the subject.
|