mlukfc.com Forums

mlukfc.com Forums (https://www.mlukfc.com/forums/index.php)
-   Tyre Tracks & Broken Hearts (https://www.mlukfc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   For Crying Out Loud - DUET??? (https://www.mlukfc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=243)

Shane 09 May 2002 12:32

For Crying Out Loud - DUET???
 
I would like to know what people would think about For Crying Out Loud being done as a duet.

I thought that perhaps Meat and Patti could alternate on the verses, and on the coda at the end.

LucyK! 11 May 2002 21:50

I'm not sure about this one :? Nothing could ever beat the original, Meat belting it out with the orchestra, and I don't think that anyone could recreate the feeling he does when he sings it. However, I have a live version of FCOL ( nice one Ewan :wink: ) and there's a tiny bit of harmony on the line For Crying Out Loud, and it's only on that line, and it's really effective! But it is just one line and I don't know that it would have quite the same effect if the whole song was harmonised as a duet

Lucy

Meatles 12 May 2002 17:07

I think that Meat and Patti should try doing it as a duet on the Summer Tour, Meats voice has changed since then and is even better for that type of vocal now. On the NOTP he had a really high vocal range and an orchestra voice, Beautiful!!!! I am seeing him half way into the tour and I am hoping his voice isn't worn down by then. I know that the chances of him performing For Crying Out Loud are very slim, but I can dream.

RSG 14 Oct 2003 03:58

well, I personally don't think so. meat says when he sings this song, he imagines someone haveing a loss. a loss of something the character loved really much so. i'm beginning to see that image more and more everytime. so NO, I can't see it being a duet. Maybe Patti doing background vocals, on the CODA part. Cause Patti has a beautiful voice, and it deserves to be heard as much as possible. I wouldn't mind hearing Pearl sing another duet. SWEET :) 3 amazing singers.

shadow1000001 14 Oct 2003 05:34

I voted no. I guess I just can't see that song as a duet. I just think that it would lose something. :?


Maria

evil nickname 14 Oct 2003 09:25

I voted no, cause the option 'hell no - and what were you thinking when you thought this up?' was not present.

There is no way it could work, cause first of all - it wasn't written as a duet. You got one person trying to explain something to one other person. Not two people telling eachother something.
Besides: I think the original is as close to perfection as anything Meat has ever done. So why touch it?
If you really want a duet - write a new one.

Sapphire Lady 14 Oct 2003 09:59

I'm another "no" vote I'm afraid :(

I don't think this would work as a duet. It's a very intense, emotional song and splitting it into two parts would detract from this. It should be left the way Jim intended it.

I remember we also had the same debate about Two Out of Three and I think the general opinion was also "no".

dottie 14 Oct 2003 17:50

No again - My opinion only, is that Meat is at perfection when he sings For Crying Out Loud, no matter the format, whether it be live (rare) or recorded. The emotion that Meat places into this song, I believe would detract if any other singer at all, were to duet with him.

dashinblonde 27 Oct 2003 15:51


i voted "no" too. i just dont think that it beats the original, its too good to change. :)

KellyM 27 Oct 2003 17:50

No, no and more no. Cryin out loud is Meat at his very best, PERFECTION. No room for improvement! The greates love song ever.

Bren 31 Oct 2003 20:40

Quote:

Originally Posted by KellyM
No, no and more no. Cryin out loud is Meat at his very best, PERFECTION. No room for improvement! The greates love song ever.

have to agree with you there :D

Bren

Gez 31 Oct 2003 22:01

For crying is such a great ballad by Meat..
But sing in your head Patti as a duet... For Taking in the sun when feeling so cold(Patti), for giving me a child (Meat) etc etc.

Might not be to bad???

mariella 01 Nov 2003 18:00

This doesn't sound good to me. I love this song too much, no changes please.

xxx

Mariella

Rob The Badger 01 Nov 2003 20:06

No No No No NO!
Horrible horrible idea. . .this song is written from the prespective of one person. . .not two.
Oh, one side comment, the song's about more about sex than love. . .but then again, aren't all Steiman songs? :lol:
Proof?
"And can't you see my faded levi's bursting apart". . .*ahem*. . .Yes Jim, I can see them very clearly, not a pretty sight either.

Tim 01 Nov 2003 23:21

Lucky that 70% of the totall of the voters had my tought. That would be terrible. A FCOL duet... brrr... it makes me shiffer.

LostSoul 12 Nov 2003 02:15

CRYING OUT LOUD for a duet?
 
Blaspheme!

"For Crying Out Loud" is a jewel, can't break it in two!
NO, of course!

Cpl Mickey 12 Nov 2003 09:47

I voted NO aswell FCOL is a clssic

Woman of Steel 12 Nov 2003 21:08

No, For Crying Out Loud is best left alone. It is a classic, probably one of the three most beautiful songs I've ever heard, I just don't think you can break it in two. Besides, Meat sounds heavenly on it alone... :D :D

PanicLord 12 Nov 2003 22:24

No - I think they should leave it. Meat could possibly sing it even more incredibly these days, but don't mess with something this good!


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 20:41.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©1999 - mlukfc.com
Made by R.


Page generated in 0.03905 seconds with 11 queries.