New Rolling Stone Interview
 

For those who haven't yet seen it -- enjoy! It's factually inaccurate and badly written in places, but that's online journalism for ya.

Interesting nonetheless!

http://www.rollingstone.com/music/fe...llapse-w430504

Do you think they used a touch of Photoshop on Meat's face there? Maybe he likes the make up?? I'm not judging!!!

Paul COOK.
GG Rolling Stone...

NO they didn't , It's a coloring technique they used for the whole picture and the Lighting , plus the make up artist was bad but I didn't know that until I saw the proofs !! Yes it was very inaccurate ..that is why I didn't put it on my FACEBOOK page , but Jim liked it . Why ? I told the writer to read Jim's letter on my FACEBOOK and Jim got a Quote in . M

Hey, either way -- I thought it was entertaining!! And I think it's a good piece of promo for the album. And c'mon, secretly, you enjoyed the make up, right? I won't tell a soul!!

Scouts honor.

RE the post you made about your health. I sincerely hope that it's something you can recover from -- please take care, okay? I know that's easy to say from this side of a computer with the anonymity of the Internet and everything, but just remember -- even the people who don't know you DO care about you!!

P.S. For the record -- I really liked that Rolling Stone piece.

Some mistakes - like anotherday said. But I'm wondering on one fact: they wrote about Bat 1 and Bat 2, as examples of collaboration between Meat and Jim, but they didn't mention about Dead Ringer:??:

PS. Generally - the article was quite good.

Typical Jim, always wanting to get publicity :lol:

Seriously though, the article is ok...there are a couple of good stories in...but i do feel sorry for poor Todd Rundgren getting lumbered with the "producer of Bat 3" title when its well known the thing was pretty much finished by the time he arrived to it bar a couple of songs.

Hey, I like the photo!!!

Me too :D