![]() |
VCR / DVR / HDR ?
Quote:
|
HDD is the way forward. My V+ box with Virgin Media is great. When it works. :roll:
|
When I moved into my house in May 2006 I had a box packed with VHS tapes and some Meat recorded tapes amongst there and the Brixton show, London 1982 and Bat 2 picture. It's still all packed up in the garage. That's how often I use VCR. I'd rather just wait and see what else gets released (or indeed watch off YouTube) rather than see if that old stuff still works. Indeed - bringing this back to topic - I don't think there is much wrong with watching stuff that was on TV somewhere that someone has put up on YouTube. I don't really consider that illegal in the same sense of filesharing albums. If content on YouTube was really only filtered down to copyright owned material I reckon probably about 90% YT content would have to go and it would be an extremely boring amateur video site.
|
Quote:
Carole |
Why would you wait for any specific person to give someone a VHS player. I'm sure you can find one on ebay anywhere in the world, or craig's list. Failing that, maybe try the local dumpster. :razz:
|
Quote:
On the subject of illegal downloads and the music industry. I would never download something that was available from legal sources but I've seen a couple of bootlegs and some of them are absolute treasures that I'd have loved to have seen live but was too young. These recordings did add to my admiration of Meat's talent for putting on a fantastic show and I remember after seeing the first one I said to myself that I had to see this man live. I was lucky enough to have been able to do that this year. If these recordings do get released from an official source then I will gladly purchase them because I enjoy them so much. I've made my decision to watch these recordings, just as some others have decided not to. That's fair enough in my mind. |
Quote:
Quote:
Caryl |
Quote:
|
Quote:
And back to topic, thanks to all who explained bootlegs and legality vs illegality on the subject to me ! |
Quote:
best to get it recorded onto a dvd, then play the dvd in your dvd player :D |
Quote:
|
I would actually bypass the DVD recorder all together and go straight to HDD. I seem to recall my DVD recorder being more of a faff than the VCR it replaced.
|
Well that's what I mean, I can understand the justification in using a VCR for a convenience thing. I just think the financial side of it is completely unjust. VCRs were never cheaper than DVD recorders are now and as I said you can buy a stack of disks for a fraction of how much tapes used to cost. HDD is indeed the way to go.
|
Tapes, arguably though, have better quality
|
Argue that fact then.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Carole |
That's what I've done too. All the VHS tapes got copied to DVD and then, aside from a few "keepers", got dumped.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I have some very rare Elvis stuff on VCR that you currently cannot get on DVD so for me having a VCR is essential, I also have some rare Meat stuff on VCR that is also not currently available on DVD !! |
VHS is old but was never actually good. Even when it came out it was eclipsed technically by Betamax and that Phillips system.
If you have a DVD recorder it's very easy to copy VHS to DVD. Or a video capture device on a PC will do the job. Then the bulky old tapes can get dumped in a landfill somewhere. We sold a load at car boot sales but these days they're almost unsellable. |
Quote:
|
As long as it's not a VHS tape with the original 27 minute Surf's Up music video on it and when you play it backwards you get an unheard live version of Meat performing Renegade Angel with Jim Steinman playing Tuba with his toes.
|
You have that tape too? And there I was thinking my collection was superior! :twisted:
|
Tape quality blows, both as VHS and audio. Audio tapes still hold a special place in my heart for reasons of reminiscence only. HDD and the digital generation have still created better quality for the reasons outlined above.
Now vinyl on the other hand...? Now you're talkin'!! |
Quote:
|
Quote:
A tape has a longer life span A tape is more uniform a Tape has better boxes A VCR hooked to a surround sound is killer |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
I see you've been at the Christmas booze stash already ... |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
A circle is surely always more uniform? http://www.secure-at.com/Images/Accessories/vhstape.jpg http://www.clippingimages.com/blog/w...-format-us.jpg If you mean uniform with regards to playback I disagree too. Analogue playback is always more susceptible to "subjective" playback interpretation I reckon. There were sooo many factors on VHS recorders which could interfere with playback quality, some came with 2 playback heads, some 4, some with 6! Quote:
http://www.filmdetail.com/wp-content...ray-cover1.jpg over this. http://images.wantaddigest.com/proof...I06_A00139.jpg But if you like old tacky boxes it's a subjective matter I guess. Quote:
As Andy points out VHS doesn't even support 5.1, there is no room on the actual tape to support that many audio channels. |
:wtf: If Wario prefers some older technology its hardly a crime.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
But what i forgot to say was VHS tapes have a bigger library. DVDs dont exist for every movie released pre 2001 |
Quote:
|
I'd say that the library of available releases is probably fairly even now. The numbers of releases that are of interest and aren't available on DVD are very low (and for videotape you're limited to pretty much the second hand market) Can't remember the last time I wasn't able to buy something on disc that I used to have on tape.
|
Quote:
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_8GSnE-STkv...dventure-1.jpg http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...Kong_Video.jpg and most notably: http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/...500_AA300_.jpg |
Yes, but what are they deserving of exactly? ;-)
|
Quote:
Actually the tiny toons movie has some great writing, I always watched it the day after school let out up until last year when I graduated. great songs too. Kong is actually a pretty decent musicalized version sans the happy ending. and Bad Attitude live is Bad Attitude live ... |
My crystal balls :shock: tell me that your third pick will be released in the spring of 2012. I couldn't give :shit::shit: about the other two. :twisted:
|
d-vhs was about the maximum developement of the vhs format, from memory it was capable of high def, can't rem what the sound formats were... it was along time ago now... and dvd killed it
laserdisc also well worth a mention as the ultimate for home cinema back in the 80's/90's (and laserdisc muse would have been its ultimate developement.. i think was high def about 16 years ago) and a damn good heavy vinyl album in great condition on great equipment by a good band will always be a pleasure to own and listen too (ish) |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
It was S-VHS, and it was only hi def picture, best you could get soundwise was stereo.
I'd imagine a studio tape isn't repeatedly used over and over again which is where the degradation comes from with tape. |
Quote:
|
Super VHS - better resolution but otherwise similar shite to standard VHS.
|
about 400 lines res if i rem correct, laserdisc about 420 and dvd was about 450
very different to d-vhs though dvd is about 500 res apparently, oops, its been a while |
My ex bought his video recorder when they first came out, he was one of the first to buy one, back then it was beta. Unforfunately for him, VHS came out shortly after that and really took off, and beta wasn't that popular. Even though, technially beta was far superior to VHS, it was used by professionals in TV studios and the like.
Carole |
Quote:
its almost universal in the technology battle that the best marketed and usually inferior product wins... (in my opinion) |
Are you sure it was Betamax and not Betacam? The latter was the pro equivalent of Betamax (same tapes but different otherwise).
|
Quote:
Carole |
Quote:
|
And a little bulky. "Have to leave the hairdryer hun, we're taking the camera"
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Hi, every body. A question and please, again, I know nothing about these things so bear with me. Is there such a thing as a piece of equipment that can be hooked to tv and record directly onto a dvd, disk ? What is it called ? I think I'd like to price some. Thanks !
|
I assume you're referring to a DVD recorder. Yes there is such a piece of equipment. The end result is much better than a VCR, although you'll probably find getting there a bit more fiddly. As I said further up, you'd be better off skipping that stage all together and going for a HDD recorder instead. Or even going for a combined HDD/DVD if you really need to burn things to disc.
|
Quote:
|
HDD=Hard disk drive. It replaces the VCR/DVD recorder and stores everything onto a hard drive. All you have to do is press record, so it's the simplest solution.
|
| All times are GMT +2. The time now is 08:16. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright ©1999 - mlukfc.com
Made by R.